Popular 

What is BP BLG 22?

Leia Doyle

What is BP BLG 22?

BATAS PAMBANSA BLG. 22. AN ACT PENALIZING THE MAKING OR DRAWING AND ISSUANCE OF A CHECK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT FUNDS OR CREDIT AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

What are the elements of BP BLG 22?

The elements of the offense under BP 22 are (a) the making, drawing and issuance of any check to apply to account or for value; (b) the maker, drawer or issuer knows at the time of issue that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank for the payment of such check in full upon its presentment; …

How do you prove BP 22?

To be liable for a violation of BP 22, the following essential elements, as paraphrased, must be present: (1) the making, drawing, and issuance of any check for value; (2) the knowledge of the maker, drawer, or issuer that at the time of issuance he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank; and …

Can you go to jail for violation of BP BLG 22?

Trial will follow. If the accused is found guilty, BP 22 provides that the penalty for its violation is imprisonment for at least 30 days but not more than one year, or a fine of at least double the amount of the check but not to exceed P200,000.

How much is the bail for BP 22?

For violations of the Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22), the Bail Guide recommends bail of P6,000 for every P40,000 of the face value of the check in question, not to exceed P120,000.

What is the penalty for violation of BP 22?

BP 22 punishes the issuer of the worthless check with imprisonment of not less than 30 days but not more than one year or a fine of not less than but not more than double the amount of the check, which fine shall in no case exceed P200,000 or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court.

Is payment a defense in BP 22?

22. Said payment withinthe period prescribed by the law is a complete defense. Generally, only the full payment of the value of the dishonored check during the five-day grace period would exculpate the accused from criminal liability under B.P.

Is good faith a defense in BP 22 cases?

Appellant asserts that good faith on her part was a valid defense to rebut the prima facie presumption of deceit when she issued the checks that subsequently bounced. Since there was allegedly no proof of notice19 of the dishonor of the checks, appellant claims that she cannot be convicted of violation of BP 22.