What is the definition of the plain view doctrine?

What is the definition of the plain view doctrine?

plain view doctrine n. the rule that a law enforcement officer may make a search and seizure without obtaining a search warrant if evidence of criminal activity or the product of a crime can be seen without entry or search.

Is the plain view doctrine an exception to a search warrant?

10) However, the plain view doctrine is a separate seizure doctrine, not an exception to the search warrant requirement and, therefore, viewing one document that may be used as evidence of a crime does not necessarily permit the search or seizure of the entire computer.

What was the purpose of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense?

In this excerpt from Common Sense, Thomas Paine lists the groups that prefer an alliance with Great Britain over living in a free country. What is his purpose for doing so?. .

Is there any further doctrine Besides philosophical science?

Article 1. Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required? Objection 1. It seems that, besides philosophical science, we have no need of any further knowledge. For man should not seek to know what is above reason: “Seek not the things that are too high for thee” ( Sirach 3:22 ).

What do you need to know about plain view doctrine?

Plain view doctrine. the officer to have a lawful right of access to the object, and the incriminating character of the object to be “immediately apparent.”. In order for the officer to seize the item, the officer must have probable cause to believe the item is evidence of a crime or is contraband.

What was the plain view doctrine in Washington v Washington?

The Court has analogized from the plain view doctrine to hold that, once officers have lawfully observed contraband, “the owner’s privacy interest in that item is lost,” and officers may reseal a container, trace its path through a controlled delivery, and seize and reopen the container without a warrant. 348 Washington v.

When does the plain feel doctrine apply in a pat down?

Analogously, plain feel doctrine applies in pat-down searches when an officer by plain feel of the outside of clothes reasonably believes an item in the person’s pocket is a contraband or evidence.

What was the plain view doctrine in Arizona v Hicks?

In Arizona v. Hicks, the police officers were in the apartment under another exception to the warrant requirement, exigent circumstances. This qualified as a lawful entry and the plain view doctrine applied to items the officers could see in the apartment.